BlogNomic: The Ninth Dynasty of ais523

We really need to sort out a sane Location system now that movement is important, though.

Oh, wait, I have to post extra half-quorum EVC junk if I want the proposal to do anything.

CoV for ring wand larceny. The game’s afoot.

ring wand larceny The game’s afoot.

ring wand larceny.  Specifically not saying the other part because I think a four-part victory condition is too many parts.

wand larceny. The first part contains a grindy daily action, which is bad bad bad; if I can’t remove them from the glossary, I can at least try to prevent subproposals with them in passing.

Ring wand larceny

          ring wand larceny. The game’s afoot. DUN DUN DUN

wand larceny. The game’s afoot.

Please no one CoV; it’s going to be hard enough to admin as it is.

@Ienpw: CoVs are easy to handle since we have two different vote trackers (blognomicbot and athelioscript).

Tallying four separate EVCs is the tricky bit.

Ring: 5
Wand: 7
Larceny: 7
The Game’s Afoot: 4

Wand, larceny. The game’s afoot.

ring wand The game’s afoot.

Josh should make an EAV.

ring wand larceny. The game’s afoot.

Wand, larceny. The game’s afoot. Bout time there was a VC proposed.

wand, larceny, The game’s afoot.

Ring: 7
Wand: 12
Larceny: 11
The Game’s Afoot: 9

Ring, Wand, Larceny.  Not terribly comfortable with the last part…

@Aqua: Why?

@Darth Cliche: I’m all for adding victory conditions, but this one strikes me as a bit unattainable.  Additionally, there’s no mechanism in “Proposal: The Da Genie Code” to allow for the transfer of Relics away from an Adventurer.  What happens if someone collects an Amulet and goes idle?  I’d rather see an expansion of those mechanisms before we populate the means of attaining victory.  I would conditionally vote in favor of the last portion of this proposal if those topics were addressed.

Does the Transportation Rod place itself somewhere else random once used?

Also, it’s “Rod”, not “Rob”. Typo.

ding band larzeny the fame’s afoot