Monday, May 17, 2010

Proposal: Fewer (but still more) hooks

Quorumed, 16-0. -Darth

Adminned at 20 May 2010 09:41:43 UTC

If the proposal entitled “Match Proposal” (proposed on May 17) is not passed, make the following modification in rule 2.3.:

Change

...unless that Proposal would supply a sufficient definition or explanation so as to cause at least one Hook then in the Ruleset to cease to be a Hook.

to

...unless that Proposal would supply a sufficient definition or explanation so as to cause the total number of Hooks in the Ruleset to decrease upon passage of the Proposal.

 

Why?  Well, I like Hooks very much, but the game is rapidly becoming too confusing.  But I don’t want there to be a total cessation of new Hooks!  This will slowly decrease the number of Hooks, while still keeping the game quite interesting.

Comments

spikebrennan:

17-05-2010 21:29:07 UTC

for

Jumblin McGrumblin:

17-05-2010 21:41:32 UTC

for

Galdyn:

18-05-2010 00:40:33 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

18-05-2010 01:37:21 UTC

for And you made the proposal correctly. Well done.

Darknight: he/him

18-05-2010 01:40:11 UTC

for

dbdougla:

18-05-2010 01:57:43 UTC

for

Anonyman:

18-05-2010 18:28:16 UTC

for

Bucky:

18-05-2010 21:25:41 UTC

imperial

flurie:

18-05-2010 23:23:23 UTC

for

Rodney:

19-05-2010 01:24:07 UTC

for

Klisz:

19-05-2010 15:05:33 UTC

for

omd:

19-05-2010 15:18:05 UTC

for

lilomar:

19-05-2010 18:17:04 UTC

imperial

Qwazukee:

19-05-2010 22:08:03 UTC

for

ais523:

20-05-2010 04:29:19 UTC

for