Monday, August 08, 2016

Proposal: Fiiissshhh…

Fewer than a quorum of Hunters not voting against. Failed 2-9 by Kevan.

Adminned at 10 Aug 2016 13:37:58 UTC

Create an new rule,“Hunger”, containing the following:

A Hunter has a statistic, called hunger, tracked in the GNDT. Hunger defaults to 15. Each day, a hunter must lower their Hunger by one. If Hunger reaches zero, a hunter is Starving. A Starving Hunter must not take any action that would not cause their hunger to increase. If hunger reaches a negative number, the scribe is Comatose, and cannot preform any action. Any Hunter may render a Hunter no longer Comatose by Sacrificing (1/2)|x|, where x is the negative value of a Comatose Hunter’s Hunger. The Comatose Hunter’s Hunger is immediately set to 1 and they are now no longer Comatose.

Add a subrule to this, called “Fishing”.

A Hunter may increase their hunger by Fishing. Fishing is a daily action and Inclusive. A Hunter who Fishes may increase their Hunger by two. Any rules that add a new way to gain hunger must be appended to this rule.

Probably a better way to start…

Comments

RaichuKFM: she/her

08-08-2016 18:50:29 UTC

Note: The time scale is odd, and rather grindy. And it needs to default to a value.

Bucky:

08-08-2016 19:28:45 UTC

against  because of how much attention it demands from Hunters.  Having a mandatory action for everyone every day is a bad idea unless it’s the dynasty’s core mechanic (which this shouldn’t be).  And having a mandatory action that’s beneficial to “forget” is asking for abuse. 

Let’s wait for RaichuKFM to propose something before we go too deep on dynastic mechanics.

qwertyu63:

08-08-2016 19:48:50 UTC

against Let’s not have a negative mandatory daily action that half of us will forget (be that actually forgetting it or pretending to do so).

Clucky: he/him

08-08-2016 20:01:39 UTC

against per bucky

Brendan: he/him

08-08-2016 20:55:50 UTC

against

Aname:

08-08-2016 23:07:51 UTC

against per all above

RaichuKFM: she/her

09-08-2016 02:39:22 UTC

against

GenericPerson:

09-08-2016 06:58:43 UTC

against

Aft3rwards:

10-08-2016 02:28:40 UTC

against

Matt:

10-08-2016 11:04:10 UTC

for Maybe a wasted vote due to quorum but I like the dynamic of this proposal.

Kevan: he/him

10-08-2016 11:25:36 UTC

against