Monday, June 06, 2016

Proposal: Final Boss

Timed out 2 votes to 1. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 08 Jun 2016 18:29:11 UTC

Enact a new rule, “Two-Player Mode”:-

If all Proposals enacted in the previous seven days were made by only two Hunters, and if one of those Hunters is the Moderator, then the game is in Two-Player Mode and the other Hunter is the Immoderator. Otherwise there is no Immoderator.

The Immoderator may use VETO as a voting icon to cast a Vote on a proposal made by the Moderator; when the Immoderator casts a vote of VETO on a Proposal, this renders the Proposal Vetoed.

If the game is in Two-Player Mode, the string “(other than the Moderator)” is ignored in the rule Victory and Ascension.

Is anyone else playing, apart from Brendan?

Comments

Larrytheturtle:

06-06-2016 14:01:06 UTC

I’m around but I haven’t had much of an opinion on the last few proposals and I haven’t had the ability to get a photo yet so I haven’t said anything.

Aname:

06-06-2016 16:24:06 UTC

I thought I’d have more time these days, but a lot of things popped up. I probably won’t be able to participate actively for some time, so I guess I’m asking to become idle.

Kevan:

06-06-2016 16:40:07 UTC

Aname is idled; quorum drops to 3.

Brendan:

06-06-2016 16:48:27 UTC

for

Larrytheturtle:

06-06-2016 18:25:35 UTC

since if only 2 people are active then vetoing doesn’t mean anything as an against vote would cause it to fail. The only real difference with this is that kevan could win.  against

RaichuKFM:

06-06-2016 18:58:12 UTC

As mentioned before, I don’t have the ability to easily get photos onto my laptop, and I can’t go to most of these places anyways; nor do I really have people in these places to ask to do so for me.

I don’t really have the inclination to propose a change that would be drastic enough to address that, since, it seems like it would mess up what’s been aimed for, here. I’m just here in case I see a scam (other than the trade-easy-Targets-million-points thing) or someone leaves a Proposal unresolved for too long again.

Kevan:

06-06-2016 22:00:54 UTC

[Larry] If only two players are active and one of them can’t win, then we may as well stop playing at that point. Gameplay automatically shifting into something else seems more fun for the last player. And the veto was intended to put the two competing players on an even footing if (as is the case here) other players are still voting. Is it a problem if the Emperor wins?

[Raichu] Would different targets help? You could try shifting them towards places where you know people who could take them.