Friday, May 23, 2025

Proposal: Final Printing

In the rule “Drafts and Plans” add a subrule named “Final Drafts” with the following text:

A Draft is Final when the Plan Link that names it is formatted in bold text.

If a Drafter has a non-blank Plan Link, and that Drafter has not changed their Plan Link in the past 48 hours and has not edited the Draft named in that Plan Link in the past 48 hours, that Drafter may format their Plan Link with bold text to indicate that it names a Final Draft.

When a Draft is Final, that Draft may no longer be edited, and Reviews meant for that Drafter may not be created, removed, or replaced.

If at least a quorum of Drafters have a Final Draft, and a single Drafter has the highest Rating, that Drafter has achieved victory.

Per suggestions in “Print It”, I’m keeping this part simple. If we need to deal with ties or with a Drafter who never sets their Draft to a Final Draft, we can come up with Proposals to handle that situation at that time.

Comments

DoomedIdeas: he/him

23-05-2025 01:58:40 UTC

Should the Drafter with the highest rating have to have a Final Draft, so that they can’t wait for other players to finalize their draft before trying for a scam while they haven’t finalized their own?

ais523: Supervisor

23-05-2025 02:25:41 UTC

It probably doesn’t matter – if you would be the winner under this proposal, then you could become the winner under the revised version simply by finalising at the point where you’d win.

As such, not needing to finalise is probably better because it reduces the need to do timing snipes.

DoomedIdeas: he/him

23-05-2025 05:38:46 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

23-05-2025 05:55:21 UTC

arrow I feel like the idea has merit, but in its current form no one would ever make their draft final unless a) they have a higher review score the current leader or b) they are throwing to the current leader

So being the first to go final, you’re basically stuck having to convince everyone else to throw to you. And if you do get a majority to throw to you, that’ll probably annoy enough of the game that I don’t think it’ll be a great result

Clucky: he/him

23-05-2025 06:06:09 UTC

This also would allow a new player to swoop in, break a tie at the end just by getting a single highly rated draft

ais523: Supervisor

23-05-2025 06:56:02 UTC

I can see an argument that there should be some artificial reduction in score for Drafters who don’t have many reviews, to solve the “swooping in” problem.

Clucky is right about the “players won’t finalise unless they’re winning” problem, though – this proposal in its current state wouldn’t be able to end the dynasty unless players choose to give up on trying to win this dynasty because they’re excited for the next one. I think several players would make that choice, but maybe not enough for the victory condition to function.

ais523: Supervisor

23-05-2025 06:56:28 UTC

(I forgot to vote: it’s arrow)

Josh: he/they

23-05-2025 08:12:05 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

23-05-2025 08:30:18 UTC

against Per Clucky, particularly the swoop.

You must be logged in as a player to post comments.