Its not clear to me how it can be interpreted to be infinite but ok

Thanks for the vote! Essentially, if “Power and Assets” is saying you can Propaganda, then “Years” needs to restrict the number of times or it goes infinite.

Here “Years” is given an unambiguously restrictive (vs. solely permissive, if taken that way,) form of speech.

The introduction of the ambiguous word “other” creates a loophole where it can be argued that a single Annual Action can be taken indefinitely, if you interpret “Action” to mean “an item from the list of actions” rather than “an instance of an action that has been taken”. (If I take an Attacking action, then I can argue that I haven’t taken any of the “other” actions - Propaganda, Drilling, Money Gain, Money Change - and can take the Attacking action again, repeatedly.)

Lol. Ok ok, I guess we’re even on grammatical mishaps.

You’re all making me work hard given that I only have a phone for the next few hours but:

‘If’ vs. ‘if and only if’ in the ruleset has come up before and I always come down on the side of ‘only if’ being not necessary because (a) actions are not allowed by default in the ruleset (b) any “you may X if Y” statement would be meaningless in Y otherwise (c) I don’t want to encourage having to always write “if and only if” for this kind of thing.

Maybe this isn’t what this whole thing is, in which case I can give it all a closer reading in a few hours.

CoV again.

Well, we haven’t had a CfJ yet that disputed Kevan’s use of the “if” bug. Let pokes write one, whenever he’s ready. This fix for that was tardy, so s/k: