Sunday, February 07, 2010

Proposal: Fix to part three fix

Timed out 9 (!) votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 10 Feb 2010 02:36:54 UTC

In Rule 2.5 Bloodline replace “If two Guests should ever have the same degree, the Executor should choose one of those Guests at random and raise or lower their degree by 1.” with

If two Guests should ever have the same degree, the Executor should choose one of those Guests at random and raise their degree by 0.5.

If a new Guest arrives, he could mess up the order… See fix part three for details.

posted by Keba at 07 Feb 2010 23:45:52 UTC Comments (11)

Comments

Keba:

07-02-2010 23:55:33 UTC

With this new Proposal I also changed “1” to “0.5”, because this minimize the mess-up effect even more.

Darknight: he/him

08-02-2010 00:04:14 UTC

imperial

Put:

08-02-2010 13:08:41 UTC

I still don’t get why kevan vetoed fix part three, my proposal didn’t remove the possibility of a non heir guest becoming heir through the arrival of a new guest

Keba:

08-02-2010 13:45:23 UTC

Kevan was right.

My Proposal said we shoud remove “or lower” in the last sentence of the Rule. Your Proposal added a new sentence, so Kevan was not able to remove “or lower” in the last sentence.

Kevan: he/him

08-02-2010 14:05:03 UTC

It would have timed out and had no effect about an hour later; I thought I might as well veto it and give Keba the slot back, since I was an admin who was awake.

for

Put:

08-02-2010 14:05:03 UTC

Ah, that’s why you should quote sentences when you refer to them >_>

Klisz:

08-02-2010 23:30:54 UTC

imperial

There:

09-02-2010 06:35:57 UTC

for

Put:

09-02-2010 13:35:21 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

09-02-2010 15:13:36 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

09-02-2010 17:00:48 UTC

imperial

Nausved:

09-02-2010 17:36:52 UTC

imperial