Fame-AQ
10-3
9-3
8-3
7-3
6-2
5-2
4-2
3-2
2-1
1-1
0-1

Shiny.

Any effects incurred by a Gossip Story, eh?  I’m worried that will be too vague.  I think that authors of Proposals introducing such effects can decide to what extent Fame matters.

like hix

We should define some effects incurred by a gossip story, first. (And what does “amplified” mean, anyway? Multiplied? Added?)

Mmm, now that Kevan points it out, ‘amplified’ isn’t really well-defined either. What operation did you mean, Snowballinhell7001?

Multiplication…

Multiplication…

Too vague, though it’s a good idea.

If I had intended addition I would have said “augmented” instead of “amplified.”

i agree with the mapping ‘amplified
|-> multiplication’.

I think that the use of amplified is clear enough. 

It’s a fair enough mapping, but I don’t think it’s obvious enough that every single present and future player will read the same interpretation of it.

I’m sorry, but in my opinion we shouldn’t have to look at something and say does he man x or y.  If we have to something is undefined.  Amplified could mean to the power of for all I know.  If your going to play with numbers you need to define your teams or use terms with commonly accepted definitions.

SK: 
I’ll repropose as soon as I am able (i.e. When Gender Un-neutral Gossip can be failed).

Also, as you’ve demonstrated in your initial comment above, the list of possible mathematic effects is limited.  So I’d suggest simply including the Fame-AQ table as part of the proposed Rule, rather than talk about square roots and rounding.