Fun exploits here, but it always comes back to me as a voter not knowing what your free-text Agendas are. If you have an Agenda to make 50 Baubles exist in the economy, “someone else getting there first” isn’t a downside.

I just now edited the Proposal to prohibit editing or adding any numbers, so at best someone could copy a Facility and change what it produces, rather than how much.

The “any other Facility except” language doesn’t exempt the Terminal itself, even though it looks like it might on a quick read.

Fixed. I included both the Programming Station and the Machinist Terminal in the exemptions.

I intend to vote AGAINST because I think the concept fundamentally gives too much power to alliances over solo players. It has other issues like the 5+ component cost (up to 10 for the Dispensers!) being prohibitively expensive for non-broken applications, but while the other concerns are potentially fixable, the alliance problem isn’t.

I’m enjoying how much optimistic “write some legally binding free text, just not these two three four exploits we’ve initially thought of” we’re seeing this dynasty. (Can I have “endless Baubles”? Can I generate resources “For each Bauble in the System of Control”?)

Not knowing what your free-text Agendas are is an equally big deal, though, for me.

Endless Baubles doesn’t actually work because you can’t change a number. But I’m pretty sure that some effect exists that would be worth 10 components and some action opportunity costs to have your ally trigger.

Anyway,  . At that price there are no good, fair uses, only exploits.

Withdrawn