Wednesday, September 03, 2014

Proposal: Game On

Fewer than a quorum of players not voting against. Fails 2-4. Failed by Kevan.
Corrected the tally. -RaichuKFM

Adminned at 05 Sep 2014 05:33:26 UTC

Enact a new rule, “Scrimmages”:-

As a weekly action, the Coach may Plan a Scrimmage by giving the scrimmage a title, making a post, called a Scrimmage Post, to that effect that contains the scrimmage’s title, updating the GNDT so that no-one has a ball, and stating within the Scrimmage Post the result, X, of a DICE25 rolled using the GNDT. X hours after the last hour of the day after the day the Coach makes such a post, the scrimmage starts. No player may gain the ball in the duration after a Scrimmage Post but before the corresponding scrimmage starts.

Scrimmages? Yes, no? Only vote this in if you like it!



04-09-2014 03:59:55 UTC

imperial I feel like it cold be good with proper rules to back it up, but as it is it feels like needless delay.


04-09-2014 05:15:27 UTC

against No reason for the mechanic, and an unnecessary delay. Also only works if “Kick Off” passes really, and has some minor grammatical issues.

Sylpherna: a “DEF” vote is a FOR if you’re posting on a proposal by the Coach. Ruleset and all that. Just want to be sure since you kind of seem to be implying a neutral stance.


04-09-2014 07:44:24 UTC

against I’m struggling to parse this proposal. I’ve no idea what “to that effect that contains the scrimmage’s title” means, and “X hours after the last hour of the day after the day” is pretty confusing too.

As I understand it, to Plan A Scrimmage is to announce the start of a match, some amount of time in the future? If so, it sounds unnecessary - you may as well just have the start of the match be when you announce the start of the game.

Kevan: City he/him

04-09-2014 08:46:10 UTC

against Seems like it subtracts more than it adds.

RaichuKFM: she/her

04-09-2014 22:31:03 UTC