BlogNomic: The First Dynasty of Desertfrog

Why is this any better than the existing set of “Monks with no Station”?

Do they not provoke themselves to the confusion of their own faces? (Jeremiah 7:19)

Because there is no set of “Monls with no station”, Monks with no station are not recognised as being such. All monks should have a purpose in life even if that is just General dogsbody.

I believe that is what the - represents.  It is fine to specify a category both by what they are and/or what they aren’t, so you can naturally infer this group from the existing ones.

My logic may not be perfect, but it’s basically agreeing with Kevan.

The only thing I object to here is the last sentence, “Taking this station has no effect on the game or the rest of the rules as they are now” because my experience shows we will probably forget to clean it up later.

I don’t see the problem.  I don’t see any benefit either, but that’s never stopped me before.

Gen.1

[28] And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

every person show have a purpose within this life even if that inportance is not as inportant as those with stations

SELF KILL - Stupid Station