BlogNomic: The First Dynasty of Desertfrog

  This sounds good. However, text such as “These would be used to eventually…” and forward should be placed in the “flavor text” box.

Because of the non flavor text inclusion, which would means the actions listed there would have to be taken.

as per arthexis.  This proposal, if it passes, would accidentally modify Rule 2.3

per arth. I support the idea though

that was a CoV

Not necessarily, it’s “we may” have to change the name of the rule not have to.

@gwain: For example, if this passes the text “These would be used to eventually complete some Good Deeds.” would be legally binding. It could easily cause all sorts of breakages. What does that line means from a rules standpoint? That if I enact it, I can complete a Good Deed? Which ones? All of them? Under what condition?

CoV

I think that if this were to pass, we would have to include the entire text after the box in the Rule. I don’t think any of that is legally binding, however.

“Eventually” is an abstract concept of time, and as per the glossary, doesn’t mean anything.

The “may” makes the next part meaningless as well.

Questions obviously have no effect.

However, that would be one messed-up rule, so