Saturday, August 22, 2009

Call for Judgment: Give me glory or give me death

Fails 1-10. - Qwazukee

Adminned at 23 Aug 2009 14:42:14 UTC

If at least half the ECVs on this Call for Judgement contain the phrase “thumbs down”, then arthexis shall be removed from the game and is barred from rejoining.
Otherwise, arthexis achieves victory.

Idling is for half-cooked cowards, I have never been a mediocre one. Since Quaz vetoed my legitimate attempt to ban myself from the game I’ll have to do it through a CfJ which he can’t stop.

Comments

Wakukee:

22-08-2009 22:19:57 UTC

...lol. You realize tht just failing this makes it ineffective? against thumbs down , since I’m not giving you a victory to keep you from banning yourself.

Wakukee:

22-08-2009 22:20:53 UTC

Also, do you have room to call people childish when you refuse to refer to Qwazukee by his proper name, or even his proper nickname? (qwaz).

arthexis: he/him

22-08-2009 22:22:50 UTC

for thumbs down for myself

Wakukee:

22-08-2009 22:23:38 UTC

* I also assume you meant EVC, but if you are going to try to say that you win because you said ECV Instead of EVC… well, you know.

arthexis: he/him

22-08-2009 22:24:07 UTC

Those players who calle themselves my friends should vote FOR and a “thumbs down” on this one, for it really really is my final will, and I refuse to go down unless it is legally binding.

If you don’t ban me now I promise to annoy you until you have to ban me! :)

Wakukee:

22-08-2009 22:27:00 UTC

...that sounds… like someone’s little sister took over an account and was trying to get banned to annoy their sibling. Really, man? No one is trying to keep you from winning… we are just getting rid o a spam DoV.

arthexis: he/him

22-08-2009 22:28:41 UTC

Do you think arthexis is foolish enough to get someone else to access his account? I have my laptop cryptographically protected with a fingerprint lock and even my browser is locked with a password!

arthexis: he/him

22-08-2009 22:29:04 UTC

I think for a moment you where confusing me with yourself.

Wakukee:

22-08-2009 22:33:10 UTC

Now that me part doesn’t even make sence, but please address my “ECV” worry.

Pavitra:

22-08-2009 23:18:25 UTC

I don’t think that either winning or banning would have been the right solution, but if this is what arthexis wants, then so be it.

Nevertheless, against per “ECV”. I will vote FOR/thumbsdown on a corrected version.

Qwazukee:

23-08-2009 00:33:12 UTC

against ECV could mean whatever arht wants it to mean.

Qwazukee:

23-08-2009 00:37:53 UTC

This is in fact a scam to let him win, because since “ECV” is undefined, the “I win” part automatically kicks in.

Rodlen:

23-08-2009 00:46:29 UTC

Something tells me it was just a typo.

Rodlen:

23-08-2009 00:48:25 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

23-08-2009 00:51:49 UTC

Could be. But if it had passed, it would be a Yoda-esque scam-tacular victory.

Wakukee:

23-08-2009 00:54:15 UTC

/me takes all the credit for discovering it.

arthexis: he/him

23-08-2009 03:02:26 UTC

Wait! The ECV thing is just a typo! Wak, don’t get all high and mighty now, doesn’t suit you (it only suits megalomaniacs like myself).

redtara: they/them

23-08-2009 03:20:21 UTC

Haha

Darknight: he/him

23-08-2009 11:11:25 UTC

against

Bucky:

23-08-2009 14:38:55 UTC

against

Excalabur:

23-08-2009 14:39:37 UTC

against Stupid.

Amnistar: he/him

23-08-2009 15:29:34 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

23-08-2009 15:48:44 UTC

Hey arth, there’re some big things going down, you should come here and check it out.

Klisz:

23-08-2009 18:39:43 UTC

against

ais523:

23-08-2009 21:40:07 UTC

against so this can be adminned faster