Monday, November 21, 2022

Proposal: Good Times Apart

Reached quorum 6 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 23 Nov 2022 16:48:51 UTC

If the proposal “Ill-Timed Bad Times” enacted, this proposal does nothing.

In the rule “Well-timed Good Times”, change:

When four or more Visitors from the same Group have the Front Effect of a Queue applied to them in the same Turn


When four or more Visitors from the same Group have the Front Effects of different Queues applied to them in the same Turn


Moving the goalpost for “impressive coordination” out of line-of-sight, thereby eliminating dependence on the Gift Shop.


JonathanDark: he/him

21-11-2022 19:08:52 UTC

Is “different Queues” sufficient enough to describe no two of the same Queue? I’m just wondering if this could be made more clear to avoid confusion or rule-twisting, unless you want to leave room for that of course. ;-)

Bucky: Proprietor

21-11-2022 20:00:55 UTC

I don’t see either that argument being taken too seriously given the current wording or a clean way to word it that’s more explicit. But perhaps that’s my author’s blind spot.

JonathanDark: he/him

22-11-2022 15:48:38 UTC

Based on Kevan’s reading of the current rule that you’re trying to replace, I think it would help to be more explicit here. Otherwise, “different Queues” could simply mean at least 1 Visitor in a different Queue than the other 3, or 2-and-2, and so on.

Josh: he/him

23-11-2022 09:36:13 UTC


Kevan: he/him

23-11-2022 12:28:30 UTC


Raven1207: he/him

23-11-2022 14:58:07 UTC


Benbot: he/him

23-11-2022 15:19:31 UTC


JonathanDark: he/him

23-11-2022 16:07:32 UTC