BlogNomic: The Ninth Dynasty of ais523

Is “different Queues” sufficient enough to describe no two of the same Queue? I’m just wondering if this could be made more clear to avoid confusion or rule-twisting, unless you want to leave room for that of course. ;-)

I don’t see either that argument being taken too seriously given the current wording or a clean way to word it that’s more explicit. But perhaps that’s my author’s blind spot.

Based on Kevan’s reading of the current rule that you’re trying to replace, I think it would help to be more explicit here. Otherwise, “different Queues” could simply mean at least 1 Visitor in a different Queue than the other 3, or 2-and-2, and so on.