Proposal: Gosh darn sellouts
Reaches 1-6 and cannot achieve quorum so it fails -SingularByte
Adminned at 14 Jul 2022 04:03:51 UTC
Create a new dynastic rule named “Sponsors” with the following body, allowing the wiki to interpret the included wiki formatting into a table:
Each Operator has a Sponsorship, which is a publicly tracked value defaulting to None.
A Sponsor consists of the following: a name, which is flavor text, a description, which is flavor text, a Benefit, an Ad Read and a Severance Payment.
While an Operator’s Sponsorship is set to any value other than None, they must abide by the Ad Read of the Sponsor corresponding to their Sponsorship.
While their Sponsorship is set to None, an Operator may Accept a Sponsorship Deal, which is an atomic action with the following steps:
* Select a Sponsor
* Set your Sponsorship to the name of the Sponsor you selected
* Carry out the Benefit of the Sponsor you selectedWhile their Sponsorship is set to a value other than None, an Operator may Sever their Contract, which is an atomic action with the following steps:
* Subtract the Severance Payment of the Sponsor corresponding to your Sponsorship from your Money
* Undo the Benefit of the Sponsor corresponding to your Sponsorship, except for any sentences prefixed with “Instant:”.
* Set your Sponsorship to None.The following is a list of Sponsors:
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Sponsors
! Name || Description || Benefit || Ad Read || Severance Payment
|-
| Lending Tech Inc. || Bottom of the barrel parts for bottom of the barrel prices. || Instant: Add ₩6000 to your Money. || None. || ₩10.000
|}
Adding a basic sponsorship system, starting off with a “loan” of sorts
SingularByte: he/him
Is there intended to be any actual downsides to sponsorships, or is the cost basically that if you pick one too soon, it’s harder to pick others due to the severance costs?