Although there are better mechanisms for enforcing this; perhaps a limit of only two move actions per List.

because of the alternative “Limit Dark List Actions to 5”

Though do try to keep use of this clause to a minimum. Moving solely to make noises, for instance, could have some useful effect.

I trust Kevan, but I now don’t like arbitrary.

Prefer limit to only 2 dark actions for example.

I’d prefer a hard limit within which we can be as creative as we like.

I prefer the other solution

Well, Ive found another problem with this rule:

Assume there is a sensless move. If a guest uses lots of these sensless moves, the become sensefull (because of the “one mile long list” problem above). That means indirectly, every move on a Dark List makes sense.

Additionally “sense” is really subjective generally. A not working strategy may seem sensless to good players, but would you forbid bad strategies?

The proposal is explicitly deferring to the Executor’s subjective opinion, though, it doesn’t matter if anyone would disagree with that opinion.

CoV to speed this up. Players only get one set of Dark Actions, they shouldn’t have to second-guess what I consider “annoying”.

s/k

Not the best solution.  Limit of 5 basically solves it, and that Proposal looks to pass.