Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Proposal: Ha! Ha!

4-11. Can’t be enacted w/o CoV.—Chronos

Adminned at 16 Dec 2005 03:37:49 UTC

Add to the end of the paragraph that begins “Some Protagonists are Idle” the following sentence:

“Idle Admins are not considered to be Admins.”

posted by Cayvie at 14 Dec 2005 23:27:48 UTC Comments (15)

Comments

Elias IX:

14-12-2005 23:48:15 UTC

for this is fine and all, but the last six proposals haven’t done anything to expand on the text adventure theme.

Angry Grasshopper:

15-12-2005 00:02:36 UTC

Quazie:

15-12-2005 00:11:20 UTC

for

Rodney:

15-12-2005 00:26:38 UTC

against Why prevent old Admins from de-idling someone/themselves

Elias IX:

15-12-2005 01:20:08 UTC

against CoV.

Seventy-Fifth Trombone:

15-12-2005 02:12:38 UTC

against  For Rodney’s reason, not Elias’s.  There’s no problem with Proposals that fix Law loopholes.

Maybe we should say that the only Admin game actions that Idle Admins may take are to unIdle themselves.

notafraud:

15-12-2005 02:34:09 UTC

imperial

Saurik:

15-12-2005 02:45:19 UTC

I agree with 75th (and Rodney by transitivity) and vote against.

The Lone Amigo:

15-12-2005 03:57:23 UTC

imperial

Moonwryn:

15-12-2005 09:12:19 UTC

for

Salamander:

15-12-2005 11:16:06 UTC

against nothing would be worse than having all the admins go idle and not be able to continue play because of it.

ChronosPhaenon:

15-12-2005 13:30:12 UTC

against

smith:

15-12-2005 20:34:24 UTC

for A good idea. It is too powerful to be able to idle and de-idle yourself at will. I’ll propose a weaker version of this, since this looks like it will fail.

Excalabur:

16-12-2005 03:44:38 UTC

I also can think of several examples of idle admin still adminning things.

against

Furthermore, cayvie used his unidling power for good several times a couple of dynasties ago.  I don’t think I’ve seen anyone abuse this.

AgentHH:

16-12-2005 06:09:37 UTC

against I agree with what’s said.

Condition of failure now met.