For what it’s worth, I’m currently approaching this dynasty with the mindset that I’ll point out ruleset bugs that would create an ambiguous or frozen gamestate (ie. something we’d otherwise have to waste time resolving at the expense of other gameplay), but won’t point out loopholes (in the same way I wouldn’t shout and draw attention to a player doing something tactically clever in pure open gamestate).

I don’t have much skin in the game having come in so late, but my goal in pointing out vote-deciding problems is to only do so when I believe a proposal negatively effects me and does not positively effect enough other players to render my pointing it out counter-intuitive. ...And, you know, also proposals that straight up break things. It’s a struggle. I don’t think I’m winning this dynasty from this position.

lmao this is crazy and I love it