Proposal: Hey, That’s *my* Cookbook
Self-killed. Failed by Kevan.
Adminned at 15 Apr 2015 16:03:34 UTC
Create a Sub-rule to rule Recipes, called “Plagiarism”:
A Recipe may not be composed of exactly the same Steps (in the same order) and Packages as another. Two different Recipes may not have the same name. Thus, the set of contents of a Recipe univocally correspond to the name of the Recipe.
As a clarification: a Recipe may be posted as a comment to the most recent Review (following the limitations set by rule “Review”) even though it has already been posted on a Review.
In the Rule “Ratings” replace the numerated list starting with “1. The Rating defaults to - - - - -.” with:
1. Entry Recipes are Rated sequentially in the order they were posted as comments to the Review.
2.The Rating defaults to - - - - -.
3. For each Valued Property of the recipe that is exactly equal to the Reviewer’s Sweet Spot for that Valued Property, one minus is changed to a Star.
4. For each Valued Property of the recipe that exceeds the Reviewer’s Sweet Spot for that Valued Property, one minus is changed to a Plus.
5. If the Recipe contains the Reviewer’s Favourite Ingredient and the Rating contains 4 or more Stars, set the Rating to * * * * *.
6. If the Recipe contains the Reviewer’s Favourite Ingredient and the Rating contains at least one Plus, one Plus is changed to a Star.
7. If the Recipe does not have the Additional Property Vegetarian and the Reviewer is a Vegetarian, replace all but two Stars with Minuses.
8. If that Reviewer has already Rated that Recipe, the Rating to this instance of it becomes - - - - -.
Kevan: he/him
Having the first step of rating each Recipe being “Entry Recipes are Rated sequentially…” sounds a bit like an infinite loop.
And doesn’t the “as a clarification” of the first step contradict the rest of its rule?