Ewww! But also quite a neat design, since it provides a way to keep Insane Survivors from dying off too easily without simultaneously making it too easy to stay sane.

Nice one! Howver 10 portions although not much is too powerful, as the first one to log one will get the price. Strongly favors the admin enacting the proposal.

since it doesn’t actually prevent sane survivors from eating the item resulting from a dead survivor.

Yes it does! “Only Insane Survivors may take a bite out of a Dead Survivor.”

But an Edible Item that happens to be called “Doctor29” is not a Dead Survivor.

Not entirely convinced, though. Mechanically it’s a bit clunky (“turned into an Edible Item” isn’t very clearly defined, so there’s some scope for infinite food), and it feels a bit off-theme for nutritious food to become so readily plentiful once we all get a bit more mad and dead.

Blacky. The idea is that the dead survivor Item could change possession like any other, so 10 portions is there to give everyone a bite.

Coppro. See bateleur’s answer.

Kevan. Good point. The penultimate sentence would need changing to say ‘Dead Survivor Item’. I’m not sure there’s scope for infinite food, as it can clearly only happen once per Survivor. I’m just thinking that only Insane people would eat another Survivor, and you can only eat them once they’ve died.

[Anduril] Mechanically, we have “if you Eat a Dead Survivor you gain an Edible Item named after them”, and eferring to this process as “turning into an Edible Item” is probably a bit too informal. I could Eat Doctor29 and then argue that he hadn’t “turned into an Edible Item” - I hadn’t triggered any effects which explicitly said “Doctor29 turns into an Edible Item”, and he’s clearly still there as a Dead Survivor.

(And oh, this would work anyway, because a Dead Survivor wouldn’t be considered to be a Survivor for the purposes of this rule, so the rule couldn’t “see” them.)

Good point. s/k.