Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Proposal: High speed proposals

2-7, cannot be enacted unless someone changes eir vote. -Elias IX

Adminned at 28 Sep 2006 16:16:58 UTC

Change the first paragraph of the rule entitled “Enactment” to:

The oldest pending Proposal may be enacted by any Admin (and the Ruleset and/or Gamestate updated to include the specified effects of that Proposal) if any of the following is true:-

 
  * It has a number of FOR votes that exceed or equal Quorum, has been open for voting for at least 12 hours, and has not been vetoed or self-killed.
  * It has been open for voting for at least 48 hours, it has more than 1 valid vote, more than half of its votes are FOR, and it has not been vetoed or self-killed.
  * It has a number of FOR votes that exceed or equal Quorum, no AGAINST votes, and has not been vetoed or self-killed.

Comments

Cayvie:

09-27-2006 02:02:53 UTC

for

Hix:

09-27-2006 02:05:49 UTC

against Really, the Top Banana should always have a window to VETO.  I don’t even think the 12 hours we currently have is enough.  Also, it’s frustrating for someone who can only check up on the game once per day to log in only to find a horrible proposal with a game-breaking loophole already enacted because e didn’t get a chance to argue against it.  Again, the fact that this can happen after only 12 hours is bad enough—let’s not allow it to happen after, well, the time it takes a quorum of conspirators to vote.

Angry Grasshopper:

09-27-2006 02:16:08 UTC

I can see Hix’s objection clearly enough. Perhaps what we need is a clause allowing ‘High Speed Proposals’ within the first N days after a new game has begun.

gazebo_dude:

09-27-2006 07:05:55 UTC

against I’d vote for a version that incorporates fixes for Hix and AG’s objections.

Cosmologicon:

09-27-2006 07:41:36 UTC

against

Thrawn:

09-27-2006 16:09:15 UTC

against

I would also vote for it if it included the clause AG suggests.

ChronosPhaenon:

09-27-2006 23:29:02 UTC

against

Elias IX:

09-27-2006 23:32:11 UTC

against

Thelonious:

09-28-2006 08:16:56 UTC

against