Not entirely sure where to go from there with that, would appreciate some further development or inspiration

yeah i don’t really see where this is going either

It’s a stub, and if I had the full mechanic down then I’d have put it into the proposal, but that seems very boring.

The machines-makes-cogs idea is going to be both limited in scope and will likely involve a lot of retreating old ground, though, so thinking about how to expand the idea into game types that we haven’t touched on before will be something worth considering sooner rather than later.

“Each Worker has a Route to some or all of these Fulfilment Centres; by default each Worker has access to Shanker Haulage, and the Fulfilment Centres that each Worker has a Route to are publicly tracked.”

is “access to Shanker Haluage the same as having a route to Shanker Haulage? cause I don’t think so based on the wording, but “some of all of these Fulfilment centers” means we need have a default value (it can’t just be an empty set)

Ty

apologies for the narrow scope :(

I’m not a huge fan of stubs that introduce publicly tracked variables, until I have more of an idea where they’re going; normally, rule stubs that never get used don’t have a high cost, but an extra column in the sidebar is a fairly high cost in making sense of the gamestate.

@Jumble No need to apologise! It’s not like there’s a shortage of proposals right now so clearly things are getting going :)

cov

shrug