Failed by CfJ: Consensus Gamestate—Chronos Phaenon
Adminned at 23 Oct 2011 05:06:07 UTC
Append the following to Rule 1.3
It is the duty of a new Critic to, at the start of a dynasty, ensure that the history of the previous dynasty is properly recorded in the Wiki.
I declined to specify how the history should be recorded; I just wanted this in so that people can poke the Critic and he can get help if necessary
We should give bonuses for Speakering, really.
BlogNomic would be better off with some sort of reward for doing work, and that hasn’t happened very often in the past. (When it did, the work got done a lot faster; e.g. the fifth meta.)
Actually, 
(wouldn’t this platonically make wins fail if the new Emperor wasn’t willing to update the history?)
I don’t think so, ais, it would just mean the Emperor wasn’t fulfilling his duty (nothing says that is illegal).
Are you sure? Seems to me that rules violations in BlogNomic usually platonically fail rather than get punished… CoV 
See Hix. I can appreciate the sentiment, but I think there’s better ways to do this.
The intent is that there are no real consequences, except being yelled at.
Perhaps a better wording would be “At the start of a dynasty, the new Critic should ensure that the history of the previous dynasty is properly recorded in the Wiki.”
Not interested in tying gamestate to the history in this manner.
Doesn’t say he has to do it, which means not doing it doesn’t violate a rule which means the rule does nothing.
As an aside, whose gonna write up a page for kevs last dynasty?
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
I usually just copy the previous Dynasty, then edit. =)
redtara: they/themIdle