Friday, October 21, 2011

Proposal: Historical Artefacts

Failed by CfJ: Consensus Gamestate—Chronos Phaenon

Adminned at 23 Oct 2011 05:06:07 UTC

Append the following to Rule 1.3

It is the duty of a new Critic to, at the start of a dynasty, ensure that the history of the previous dynasty is properly recorded in the Wiki.

Comments

redtara: they/them

21-10-2011 19:05:07 UTC

for Although there should be a template to copy/paste (if one does not yet exist).

Roujo: he/him

21-10-2011 19:05:57 UTC

for I usually just copy the previous Dynasty, then edit. =)

scshunt:

21-10-2011 19:05:59 UTC

I declined to specify how the history should be recorded; I just wanted this in so that people can poke the Critic and he can get help if necessary

Klisz:

21-10-2011 19:06:23 UTC

against Seems like a bit much work for a mandatory duty.

Pavitra:

21-10-2011 19:07:52 UTC

for

ais523:

21-10-2011 19:09:06 UTC

We should give bonuses for Speakering, really.

BlogNomic would be better off with some sort of reward for doing work, and that hasn’t happened very often in the past. (When it did, the work got done a lot faster; e.g. the fifth meta.)

ais523:

21-10-2011 19:11:07 UTC

Actually, against (wouldn’t this platonically make wins fail if the new Emperor wasn’t willing to update the history?)

Soviet Brendon:

21-10-2011 19:12:26 UTC

against

zuff:

21-10-2011 19:16:36 UTC

against per ais

redtara: they/them

21-10-2011 19:19:50 UTC

I don’t think so, ais, it would just mean the Emperor wasn’t fulfilling his duty (nothing says that is illegal).

Pavitra:

21-10-2011 19:32:13 UTC

Are you sure? Seems to me that rules violations in BlogNomic usually platonically fail rather than get punished… CoV imperial

Hix:

21-10-2011 19:32:24 UTC

against Duty?  And what are the consequences of failure to do one’s duty?

Qwazukee:

21-10-2011 19:34:26 UTC

against the history is not gamestate

Rodney:

21-10-2011 19:35:16 UTC

against See Hix. I can appreciate the sentiment, but I think there’s better ways to do this.

scshunt:

21-10-2011 19:42:31 UTC

The intent is that there are no real consequences, except being yelled at.

Pavitra:

21-10-2011 19:46:29 UTC

Perhaps a better wording would be “At the start of a dynasty, the new Critic should ensure that the history of the previous dynasty is properly recorded in the Wiki.”

flurie:

21-10-2011 19:58:50 UTC

against Not interested in tying gamestate to the history in this manner.

Brendan: he/him

21-10-2011 20:55:16 UTC

against

Bucky:

21-10-2011 21:20:38 UTC

against

ChronosPhaenon:

21-10-2011 21:53:30 UTC

against

Shadowclaw:

21-10-2011 22:25:51 UTC

against

Amnistar: he/him

21-10-2011 22:29:50 UTC

against Doesn’t say he has to do it, which means not doing it doesn’t violate a rule which means the rule does nothing.

Darknight: he/him

22-10-2011 01:23:41 UTC

against As an aside, whose gonna write up a page for kevs last dynasty?

Prince Anduril:

22-10-2011 07:13:08 UTC

against

Josh: Observer he/they

22-10-2011 10:26:15 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

22-10-2011 11:01:29 UTC

against Somebody usually gets around to this.

monqy:

22-10-2011 17:29:40 UTC

against

Roujo: he/him

22-10-2011 17:48:54 UTC

Okay then. =P

CoV against

Ornithopter:

22-10-2011 18:32:15 UTC

against