This looks good but I don’t think it’s possible to add into the ruleset because of the Hearts and Spades rules, this one mentions both boards, can’t be a subrule of both (although I suppose there could be two different subrules with the same name and text) and isn’t added in the correct way.
I think we’re going to have to fix the Hearts and Spades rules somehow, maybe restrict their effects to rules which affect pieces or terrain on their respective boards, instead of just any rule which mentions them.
maybe we could CfJ it so that it fixes them before this becomes enacted?

by correct way I mean it’s not added in as a subrule of Spades or Hearts

Added “Hearted Spades” to fix it.

Feels a bit silly/weird but I guess that’s very in-setting lol

Having something secretly tracked by two people is a bit tricky, but I’m sure they can sort something out.

Hrm, I should figure out mechanics that can only be done by two Emperor figures.

I had in mind (way back) about something like Cluedo and then trials with lawyering and such (one Emperor is the person who handles the secret information for the crimes and the other is the Judge for the trials who doesn’t know this secret information, but is impartial)

The end of Alice in Wonderland IS a trial though, so yeah. It could be done. Could be good.

The idea was to have a clear separation of the laws that govern the Hearts land from the ones that govern the Spade land, but it seems it might be too problematic.

@Diabecko: I’m convinced it can still be done! The issue is that I didn’t want to favor either side just yet, as a proposer. Being neutral to the two was a deliberate choice.

I’m starting to wonder if this is too restricive. A whole paragraph will contain many generic words. It could become literally impossible for a player to make a proposal, and it would be very difficult for us to check their proposal for forbidden words. Maybe it could be limited to certain types of words (nouns, verbs). Imagine writing a proposal without using “a”, “to”, “is” etc.

(Even “is” is a verb though. I’m not native english but you get the point)

It also screws over a possible system of having one Emperor having all of the secret info and the other being an impartial judge so S/King for now. I like the idea of having our stats and such being determined by a cell/terrain though.

Yep I like the general idea.

I agree that it does need to be a bit less restrictive, but the idea is good.

CoV

RECoV

@Axemabaro @ElMarko
this proposal has been self killed so your votes have no effect; however if you were just giving your opinion of the proposal itself I understand

Just to note that since I voted against my own thing it’s “Self-Killed”, and regardless of anyone’s else’s vote, it will not pass.