Saturday, December 15, 2012

Proposal: I accidentally a word there

Vetoed, as it would have no effect if enacted. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 16 Dec 2012 12:16:08 UTC

In the rule “Secret Orders”, if the text “and may rejoin the Cult” exists, replace it with “and may not rejoin the Cult”

That’s what I meant to write. Because it seems like it if you mess up you should’t be able to get back in. Maybe some “forgiveness” concept should be added, but I think by default you shouldn’t be able to get back in to avoid loopholes.

oh wait, someone did the opposite of this. should probably have read all the pending proposals first.

posted by Clucky at 15 Dec 2012 19:45:07 UTC Comments (11)

Comments

Kevan: City he/him

15-12-2012 19:57:16 UTC

against Given that the Leader has to give permission each time somebody wants to join their Cult, they can easily enforce a no-rejoining rule if they wish to.

Clucky: he/him

15-12-2012 19:59:02 UTC

Oh right, you do delete both messages so they can’t rejoin with another request.

I still would rather see forgiveness mechanics.

quirck: he/him

15-12-2012 20:08:38 UTC

against per Kevan

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 20:34:51 UTC

against

Purplebeard:

15-12-2012 21:17:54 UTC

against

Klisz:

15-12-2012 21:18:53 UTC

against

scshunt:

15-12-2012 21:35:15 UTC

against

Josh: he/they

15-12-2012 21:47:45 UTC

for

Murphy:

15-12-2012 23:58:52 UTC

against

Cpt_Koen:

16-12-2012 01:25:11 UTC

against I wouldn’t be against some forgiveness mechanics, but until then…

Kevan: City he/him

16-12-2012 11:35:00 UTC

veto to keep the queue going, as the phrase “and may rejoin the Cult” no longer exists in the ruleset, so this proposal can have no effect.