Would require changing the GNDT code. If you can talk Kevan into doing it then go ahead but please please please don’t make this a rule.

Too trivial to be worth the effort.

(We actually don’t need Kevan, strictly speaking - we can just archive the GNDT then add people back to it in alphabetical order - but it would go out of order as soon as anyone unidles.)

per clucky
I would be all for it, but since it requires changing code I don’t really want to force anyone to have to do that unless they want to.

Or even if it doesnt require changing the code it seems to be a hassle.

i the code can be done, I’m for it.

unless Kevan is fine.

Change whatever code you want, but don’t make it a rule.

  but this should be a trivial fix for Kevan.

Doesn’t make any sense for the ruleset to be regulating something that the admins have no control over; whoever enacts this will not have the power to do what it asks, and we’ll just be putting a falsehood into the ruleset.

I’ll make the fix some time, but the GNDT was one of the first things I wrote in Perl, and its source code is quite terrifying.