Friday, August 13, 2021

Proposal: I don’t want the same stuff anymore

Timed Out. Passes 4-3.

Adminned at 15 Aug 2021 04:24:20 UTC

If https://blognomic.com/archive/we_want_more passes, this proposal does nothing.

Add the following step to the atomic action “Cycle”:

4. For each Client, remove all Wants from their collection of Wants. Then randomly select a Want for each Client from among the listed Wants, and add that Want to that Client’s collection of Wants.

I’m kinda tired of the Clients having the same Wants each and every Cycle. Just a small proposal to spice things up a little bit.

Comments

Clucky: he/him

13-08-2021 01:17:48 UTC

I think they should get mixed up. but I am a bit worried that oftentimes a want is based on what you did last cycle. so if change when a new cycle starts its kinda a crap shot

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

13-08-2021 01:21:42 UTC

True. How would you suggest changing it, though? Are you saying that I should change how Wants work, or how the proposal works?

Lulu: she/her

13-08-2021 02:07:10 UTC

there’s a proposal to change it to be based on the current cycle

lemon: she/her

13-08-2021 03:20:20 UTC

i like the system of growing / slowly-changing wants from “We Want More”, since it permits clients to have multiple wants!! i’d prefer that, on a per-cycle basis instead of a weekly basis, to this

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

13-08-2021 03:20:27 UTC

Oh yeah, just noticed that. Made this proposal dependent on that proposal failing, which looks likely to happen anyways.

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

13-08-2021 03:24:22 UTC

But consider, this could be later changed so each client generates DICE3 new wants or something. Also keep in mind that currently, clients need ALL of their wants satisfied to be satisfied, which just directly makes more wants worse at this point in time.

lemon: she/her

13-08-2021 03:33:27 UTC

i do have that in mind– it’s specifically why i want multiple wants per client!! multiple simple & specific wants makes for much more interesting gameplay than singular, hard-to-reach wants, imo. i’ll prolly make a proposal to this effect once my slots open up :0

Kevan: City he/him

13-08-2021 10:11:28 UTC

against All of them changing every round is maybe a bit too quick and chaotic.

lemon: she/her

13-08-2021 11:33:00 UTC

against

Janet: she/her

13-08-2021 15:32:30 UTC

against

Bucky:

13-08-2021 16:14:57 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

14-08-2021 01:39:18 UTC

for

ais523:

15-08-2021 01:11:18 UTC

for