Monday, March 01, 2021

Call for Judgment: I Think A Might Have Been Left Out…

Enacted 7-0, with the EVC clause not activated.

Josh

Adminned at 02 Mar 2021 09:49:33 UTC

Update the gamestate to reflect the fact that Clucky’s attempt to advance their foreign powers campaign done here (https://blognomic.com/archive/the_masquerade) should not have resulted in an increase to their power, and thus if the Doge did increase Clucky’s power because of that campaign, they should reduce Clucky’s power by 1.

If Kevan’s EVC contains the phrase “I was honestly misled”, undo all the effects of their action to Progress their Campaign done here (https://blognomic.com/archive/ladies_and_gentlemen_the_masquerade) (allowing them to perform the action again this season, provided they have not done so elsewhere)

Otherwise, update the gamestate to reflect the fact that Kevan’s attempt to advance their foreign powers campaign done here (https://blognomic.com/archive/ladies_and_gentlemen_the_masquerade) should not have resulted in an increase to their power, and if the Doge did increase Kevan’s power because of that campaign, they should reduce Kevan’s power by 1.

As has been pointed out on the slack, previous the foreign powers campaign read “The Doge must your Political Power by 1 before the next Masquerade” which arguably doesn’t actually increase your power. So gotta fix this. But Kevan has a case that he was simply following the already established rules, and thus feels a bit fair to punish him. So giving him the option to honestly go “I made my choice to advance my campaign based on people doing the same thing in the last masquerade” (and sure he could dishonestly say that too but whatever I trust him)

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

01-03-2021 22:53:00 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

01-03-2021 23:03:25 UTC

I was honestly misled: I didn’t notice the missing word, and didn’t register Jumble’s comment of “and also added in fix for non-obvious typo” on Strainer Relations as being something to scrutinise or keep in mind (I expect I read it as referring to a typo in their previous iteration of the proposal).

I was happy to pay the cost for my own carelessness, we’re meant to read the rules when we perform them, but if a refund CfJ is up I’ll take it.

for

Lulu: she/her

01-03-2021 23:12:23 UTC

for

Brendan: he/him

02-03-2021 00:04:44 UTC

imperial

Zack: he/him

02-03-2021 00:22:44 UTC

for

Raven1207: he/they

02-03-2021 02:59:29 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

02-03-2021 08:46:38 UTC

for An EVC without the phrase, per Slack.