Friday, May 12, 2023

Proposal: Idle Hands are the Devil’s Playthings

Times out 3-2 and is enacted -SingularByte

Adminned at 14 May 2023 16:47:12 UTC

If the subrule “Regional Development Fora” exists, remove the following bullet point from it:

* The Region’s current Municipal Authority level;

And replace the text:

For Effortful motions, the number in the square brackets with the word ‘Effortful’ is its Effort Value.

with this text:

For Effortful motions, the text in the square brackets following the word ‘Effortful’ is the formula used to calculate the Effort Value at the time that this Regional Development Forum event was created, where the value “Active” is the number of non-idle City Architects who control Cities in that Region.

And replace this text:

when all City Architects who control Cities in that Region have posted a valid response to it.

with this text:

when all non-Idle City Architects who control Cities in that Region have posted a valid response to it.

And replace this text:

Build [Effortful 3]

with this text:

Build [Effortful Active]

And replace this text:

Develop [Effortful 5]

with this text:

Develop [Effortful Active + 2]

 

After recent discussion that Idled Architects leave behind Cities that are all but abandoned, I realized that those cities will be a drag on others in the Region. They could remove the City, but then they would lose some advantages of having the City around. This provides another option: using the Regional Development Forum, if it ever exists, to manage Cities left behind in this way. This requires some changes in the way that the Regional Development Forums work, especially with Effortful Motions.

Comments

SingularByte: he/him

12-05-2023 17:43:46 UTC

You probably don’t need to worry about spelling out that it’s a specifically a non-idle city architect for most of this, even if Memorial passes. Cities controlled by an idle city architect are classed as being controlled, but the owners aren’t city architects.

The relevant rules would either have to refer to controllers, or refer to idle city architects to start caring about idle ones.

SingularByte: he/him

12-05-2023 17:46:29 UTC

Actually, sorry, scratch that, I’m reading it properly now and you’re doing it for a reason. Ignore me.

Bucky:

12-05-2023 18:22:00 UTC

Per rule 1.2.1, the “when all City Architects who control Cities in that Region have posted a valid response to it” does not need a “non-idle” qualifier.

JonathanDark: he/him

12-05-2023 18:28:50 UTC

It does if your “The jjm3x3 Memorial” proposal is enacted.

Bucky:

12-05-2023 18:37:24 UTC

For the purposes of all Gamestate and the Ruleset, excluding the core and appendix Rules “Ruleset and Gamestate”, “City Architects ”, “Dynasties”, “Fair Play”, “Mentors” and any of those Rules’ subrules, Idle City Architects are not counted as City Architects. The combined term “Idle City Architect” can be used to refer to City Architects who are Idle even in rules that do not treat them as City Architects.

Since “Regional Development Fora” isn’t on the list, it does not consider Idle City Architects to be City Architects.

JonathanDark: he/him

12-05-2023 18:50:41 UTC

Fair enough. It’s not required, but unless there’s a problem other than a few extra words, I think I’ll leave it in for clarity.

Josh: Observer he/they

12-05-2023 21:37:03 UTC

for

SingularByte: he/him

13-05-2023 05:25:25 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

14-05-2023 09:47:24 UTC

against Seems like significant freedom and options to the one City now lucky enough to be alone in a Region.

Chiiika: she/her

14-05-2023 15:35:31 UTC

against need rethink tbh but I’m on a ledge