Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Proposal: Ignoring the Pain

Self-killed to end the war.

Adminned at 11 Mar 2009 14:36:25 UTC

[ Rewording “Armor” to a more stuntworthy description, avoiding the overlap with the enemy’s own “armor” ratings, sharpening the wording and reducing it to 1AP, since nobody much is above 1AP at the moment. ]

Rename Rule (Armor) to “Adrenaline Rush”, and reword it to:-

Prerequisites: None.
Results: When rolling for damage during a return attack against the Stuntperson, for the remainder of the Skirmish, a roll of 1 or 2 shall be reduced to zero.
Cost: 1 AP

Add “This is known as a return attack.” before “This Soldier has finished attacking the enemy.”, in Rule 2.1.1.


Clucky: he/him

10-03-2009 18:02:52 UTC


Undermines (ba dum pish) explosives.

Would be better to state “The damage is reduced to zero”.

Kevan: he/him

10-03-2009 18:15:13 UTC

Oh, fair call. Although having a slight downside to a stunt isn’t so bad; it’s only the adrenaline junkie’s targets that won’t trigger the mines (presumably because the frenzied soldier has already run straight over them).


10-03-2009 18:37:16 UTC

against  per Clucky. Also, “return attack” is undefined.

Kevan: he/him

10-03-2009 18:44:35 UTC

The last sentence of the proposal defines “return attack”, as this seems like a useful definition to have around.


10-03-2009 20:30:06 UTC

for Works, I think.


10-03-2009 20:56:58 UTC

against I don’t like the idea itself.


11-03-2009 04:49:14 UTC

CoV for  Missed that part of the proposal.


11-03-2009 14:39:38 UTC

imperial  arrow


11-03-2009 19:56:26 UTC

Qwaz, please don’t vote def when the General’s idle.


11-03-2009 20:21:53 UTC

Hmm… Alright.  for


11-03-2009 20:22:18 UTC

CoV from against.


11-03-2009 20:26:34 UTC

If Barack Obama can vote “present,” then so can I.


11-03-2009 20:40:10 UTC


Kevan: he/him

11-03-2009 21:32:42 UTC

against  against  against Self-kill. Time to be shipped back home.