Monday, October 28, 2013

Proposal: Inaction Injunction

Passes 5-0 and is enacted.
-Spitemaster

Adminned at 30 Oct 2013 07:08:10 UTC

If the proposal “Definition for Guidance” fails, this proposal does nothing.
Append to “The Sequester”:

MUST: As a Weekly Action, an MN may make a Repeal Request, a story post that contains only the name of exactly one rule on the Sequester wiki page (The commentary need not be blank).  The title of this post must contain the word “REPEAL”.  If, after exactly 24 hours, a committee that the posting MN is a part of has all voted FOR and there are fewer total AGAINST votes than FOR votes, the Repeal Request passes.  Otherwise it fails.  If a Repeal Request passes, any MN may remove the rule in the Sequester named in that Repeal Request.

Only the MN who posted a passing Repeal Request may remove the rule in the Sequester named in that Repeal Request.

Note that Ignoring the second paragraph here allows anyone to do it.  This is mediated by 3.3.6 “Prioritization”, so the second part applies as long as it is not Ignored.

Comments

Josh: ELECTOR HE/HIM

28-10-2013 17:20:10 UTC

for

RaichuKFM: SHE/HER

28-10-2013 18:05:53 UTC

for

Bucky:

29-10-2013 16:40:14 UTC

for

quirck: HE/HIM

29-10-2013 17:40:51 UTC

imperial