Monday, December 06, 2021

Call for Judgment: Inevitably [Appendix]

Timed out, 6-3. Enacted by TyGuy6.

Adminned at 08 Dec 2021 16:46:17 UTC

Delete the rule “Prioritisation” from the Appendix.

Of course I was going to forget something. There are currently two different rules called “Prioritisation” which say different things; this CfJ fulfills the intent of the changes I made while I still had the power to edit the Ruleset. Not sure what the odds of passage are here, but it’s worth a shot.

Comments

redtara: they/them

06-12-2021 11:32:52 UTC

for two parts of the ruleset claiming the highest precedence for themselves is not ideal.

Kevan: he/him

06-12-2021 11:51:18 UTC

for

Trapdoorspyder:

06-12-2021 14:59:09 UTC

for

Jason: he/him

06-12-2021 16:14:22 UTC

Reluctant for

lemon: she/her

06-12-2021 23:42:41 UTC

for

TyGuy6:

07-12-2021 00:24:26 UTC

against Restoring the placing of Prioritisation to where it can’t be repealed without a quorum vote will become top of my own agenda if this passes, so despite the contradiction accidentally created by self-unempowered tyrant Brendan, I’d prefer to keep it in its place.

Clucky: he/him

07-12-2021 09:01:39 UTC

against

Josh: he/him

07-12-2021 20:39:19 UTC

against There are more elegant solutions that would require less unpicking