Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Proposal: Inter Regalia

Reaches quorum and passes, 8-0. Josh

Adminned at 25 Mar 2010 03:50:08 UTC

Remove the paragraph beginning “As a weekly action, a Commoner may perform spend 2 Iron, 1 Cog and 1 Coal to build a mechanical army.” from Rule 2.9.

Reword the rule “Regalia Actions” to:-

Any Commoner who possesses an Invention which includes either the Crest of the Mad Prince of the Mark of the Demented Baron may perform a Regalia Action from the list below, as a weekly action.

  • Wage War. This action costs 2 Iron, 1 Cog and 1 Coal to perform. If the Commoner performing this Action is a Loyalist, the Commoner’s current County, plus all those that neighbour it, become Unoccupied. If they are a Sympathiser, the Commoner’s current County becomes Occupied.
  • Build a Sentry Tower. By paying 5 Iron and 2 Cogs, a Commoner may build a Sentry Tower in the County they currently occupy. A County containing a Sentry Tower may not change from Occupied to Unoccupied or vice-versa. A County with a Sentry Tower is tracked in the wiki by putting {ST} after its name.
  • Dismantle a Sentry Tower. A Commoner may remove a Sentry Tower from the County they currently occupy. The Commoner gains 2 Iron and 1 Cog for doing so.
  • Use an Air Drone. A Commoner may perform any other Regalia Action as if they were located in a neighbouring County to the one that they currently occupy. Any Resource costs of that Regalia Action are doubled.

If a Commoner does not possess the Mark of the Demented Baron, they may perform the “Wage War” Regalia Action as if they possessed Crest of the Mad Prince.

Clarifying Regalia Actions per comments on the previous proposal. Making “build a mechanical army” into a named Regalia Action, clarifying where Sentry Towers are built and dismantled, and having the Air Drone only affect Regalia Actions (rather than “any other weekly action”).

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

23-03-2010 13:41:30 UTC

for

Put:

23-03-2010 14:08:31 UTC

for

Klisz:

23-03-2010 15:48:53 UTC

for

ais523:

23-03-2010 16:07:54 UTC

for

Keba:

23-03-2010 20:03:50 UTC

would be for, but mabye there is a “As a Weekly Action” missing in the last sentence. So against

Perhaps, I will change this vote…

Josh: Observer he/they

23-03-2010 20:05:14 UTC

There doesn’t need to be, a weekly action marker in the last sentence, Keba; he “as if they possessed Crest of the Mad Prince” clause covers timings, too.

Keba:

23-03-2010 20:24:56 UTC

Ah right. I am sorry:  for

Darknight: he/him

24-03-2010 01:26:14 UTC

for

Roujo: he/him

25-03-2010 00:09:33 UTC

for