Much better.

One quibble: please could you change “Uphold all attempts to Explore a Room or Light a Room this dynasty that failed” to include “prior to the posting of this CfJ”, to stop anyone from trying anything between posting and passage.

Done. Again, I think this is a no-op so it shouldn’t matter, but it may matter if Clucky’s interpretation ends up winning out but this CFJ passes anyway.

The wording at the end worries me

I feel like a scam minded player could read it as “Uphold all attempts to Explore a Room or Light a Room this dynasty that 1) failed, AND/OR
2) spent the wrong amount of Puissance, solely because:”

Could also maybe argue that if it failed for some other reason, but spent the wrong amount of Puissance, then the “solely because” applies to the “spent the wrong amount of Puissance” clause and thus the if statement holds and then action is upheld

Maybe just have something that says “treat all past actions as if they had been calculated this way” clause? Might be safer

“prior to the posting of this CfJ” I feel doesn’t actually really help resolve anything. What would someone who adds an empty room between this getting posted and this passing pay? We’d need another CfJ

Also the scenario where this passes and my CfJ passes is kinda shitty for Brendan and Jumble, as they both lose one Puissance but everyone else has their actions upheld

I don’t think it’s sensible to read “; and” as “; and/or”.

I also don’t think it’s sensible to read “solely” as “partially”.

Tightening the wording is one thing, but I don’t particularly need to feel the need to safeguard the CFJ against people reading words as though they had an entirely different meaning.

I have included a fix for the possibility of both passing (although that seems unlikely to me).

next time maybe actually read my comments as its clear you didn’t

I still worry this “Upholds all attempts to Explore a Room or Light a Room this dynasty prior to the posting of this CFJ that failed” but I guess if someone tries to claim it does we can just fight it out in another CfJ?

I’d say the pair of commas in “failed, and/or spent the wrong amount of Puissance, solely because” addresses Clucky’s concern.