Thursday, November 18, 2021

Proposal: It’s A Gas

Withdrawn. Failed by TyGuy6.

Adminned at 20 Nov 2021 04:19:50 UTC

In the rule The Narrative, change “A Realtor who has a Gas of zero is Down; whether or not a Realtor is Down is publicly tracked. A Realtor who is Down may not be the target of a Fighting action.” to

A Realtor who has a Gas of zero is Down; whether or not a Realtor is Down is publicly tracked. At least once every day, each Leader should issue a Statement, being a story post detailing which members of their Team are Down and how much Angle they have. A Realtor who is Down may not be the target of a Fighting action, may not be Up, and may not have their Gas increased through the expenditure of Angle. Realtors who are Down are not counted towards quorum on any proposal whose effect would be limited to changing the dynastic ruleset or gamestate; nor do their votes count on any such proposal, unless their vote is to withdraw a proposal to which they are the author.

Comments

TyGuy6:

18-11-2021 17:46:29 UTC

“counted towards quorum” what does this even mean? Having a bunch of players that can’t vote on dynastic proposals could be scary/slow, depending on what it means. As one example, one could much more easily repeal the mantle-passing restriction, if half the players couldn’t vote against.

Also, I’m confused as to how we ever lose gas. Are you going to bring back some part of https://blognomic.com/archive/neoclassical_gas?

TyGuy6:

18-11-2021 17:48:04 UTC

*the other part of

Josh: Observer he/they

18-11-2021 17:55:18 UTC

I’m doing things in bits; people don’t like long proposals that contain too many ideas.

The unanimous team against-vote is still a veto, I think. I’ll make that stronger.

Brendan: he/him

18-11-2021 18:38:43 UTC

“each Leader issue a Statement”—is there a “must” or “should” intended there?

Josh: Observer he/they

18-11-2021 18:45:19 UTC

Thanks Brendan, fixed

TyGuy6:

18-11-2021 19:04:50 UTC

against Sorry, thought it’s a neat idea. To remove all votes on any dynastic matter, when the effects could override anything outside of the appendix, seems risky.

Silverwing: she/her

18-11-2021 20:35:09 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

18-11-2021 20:39:30 UTC

against

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

19-11-2021 03:10:16 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

19-11-2021 09:56:45 UTC

against

Josh: Observer he/they

19-11-2021 11:26:32 UTC

against Withdrawn

redtara: they/them

20-11-2021 00:18:48 UTC

Beating a dead horse but against - not overly a fan of how discounting people’s votes in certain circumstances played out in the dynasty before last. Thought it could be cool but I’m more hesitant now.