Proposal: It’s a secret to everybody
Self-killed, failed by Angry Grasshopper.
Adminned at 02 Jun 2006 09:44:38 UTC
The contents of this proposal have been e-mailed to AngryGrasshopper and will not be reprinted here.
Self-killed, failed by Angry Grasshopper.
Adminned at 02 Jun 2006 09:44:38 UTC
The contents of this proposal have been e-mailed to AngryGrasshopper and will not be reprinted here.
AG: CfJ-worthy. I don’t know the contents of the encrypted rules, but unless they give this possibility, I read this as not-valid.
Angry Grasshopper:
Precedent setting either way. I wish that there was some way to extend debate on this, but I don’t know that we have enough active members to warrant one.
I see several ways this can be interpreted, chiefly one that does nothing. I’m voting on the premise of enacting whatever proposal that you e-mailed to me.