Precedent setting either way. I wish that there was some way to extend debate on this, but I don’t know that we have enough active members to warrant one.

I see several ways this can be interpreted, chiefly one that does nothing. I’m voting on the premise of enacting whatever proposal that you e-mailed to me.

Damn, son.

What, you don’t trust the Abbot?

AG: CfJ-worthy.  I don’t know the contents of the encrypted rules, but unless they give this possibility, I read this as not-valid.

I also read thia as not valid.

S-K.  See new version.

Hiatus