Saturday, May 01, 2010

Proposal: It’s been a long time coming.

Timed out 5 votes to 3. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 04 May 2010 02:31:05 UTC

In rule Victory and Ascension, replace

The Hiatus continues until the new Returning Officer posts an Ascension Address to the BlogNomic weblog - this shall specify the Returning Officer’s chosen theme for the new Dynasty, and may optionally include a proclamation that any number of Dynastic Rules will be repealed, and that any keywords will be replaced with new theme-appropriate terms.

with

The Hiatus continues until the new Returning Officer posts an Ascension Address to the BlogNomic weblog - this shall specify the Returning Officer’s chosen theme for the new Dynasty, and may optionally include a proclamation that any number of Dynastic Rules will be repealed, and that the words Voter and Returning Officer will be replaced with theme-specific terms throughout the entire ruleset.

Because right now, “Can”, “Comment”, “Story Post”, “Dice”, “Gamestate”, “Week”, and “Voting Icons” are just a few of the “keywords” as defined by the rules.

posted by redtara at 01 May 2010 16:46:04 UTC Comments (14)

Comments

Kevan: he/him

01-05-2010 17:13:08 UTC

for There’s some very small history of renaming terms like “Quorum”, but they can always be made as temporary dynastic rules.

Bucky:

01-05-2010 17:40:39 UTC

AGAINST

This should also allow renaming keywords defined in dynastic rules that were not repealed.

redtara: they/them

01-05-2010 17:43:47 UTC

“...and that the words Voter and Returning Officer will be replaced with theme-specific terms throughout the entire ruleset.”

Klisz:

01-05-2010 18:01:27 UTC

against  Ienpw III: He means that (to follow from the Steampunk Dynasty) the term “Invention” should be replaced as well.

Also, I prefer the ability to edit the word “week” or “gamestate” or “story post”. Makes everything flavorful.

ais523:

01-05-2010 18:45:01 UTC

imperial

dbdougla:

01-05-2010 21:05:55 UTC

for

Keba:

01-05-2010 21:29:35 UTC

Vote of abstention: (as ais is voting DEF, too):  imperial

There is neither a real problem in the current nor in “your” version.

Darknight: he/him

01-05-2010 22:01:41 UTC

imperial

SeerPenguin:

02-05-2010 03:36:32 UTC

imperial

digibomber:

02-05-2010 12:06:52 UTC

against

Ornithopter:

02-05-2010 16:48:57 UTC

for
“Keywords” in dynastic rules aren’t actually keywords, and so can’t be renamed under current rules anyhow. It been made effectively legal in the past by players unanimously “voting” not to make a CfJ.

Josh: Observer he/they

02-05-2010 19:25:19 UTC

for

Galdyn:

03-05-2010 01:38:42 UTC

imperial

Qwazukee:

03-05-2010 20:41:33 UTC

against