It’s not funny anymore.
I have used my power as admin, with Darknight’s help, to prune the CfJ’s. We have simply deleted the CfJ’s that we felt were spam and cluttering up the game. We deleted CfJ’s that had no effect on the gamestate.
I have used my power as admin, with Darknight’s help, to prune the CfJ’s. We have simply deleted the CfJ’s that we felt were spam and cluttering up the game. We deleted CfJ’s that had no effect on the gamestate.
Yea, I don’t think I’ve done anything wrong, but I wanted to let people know WHO was doing it, so there was accountability if they wanted it.
Aspect of the game needs urgent attention.
Source of most of the CfJs.
I disagree. I would CfJ this except that (a) it won’t have any long-term effects on the gamestate anyway since they’re about to be killed by earlier CfJs and (b) my legitimate CfJ disputing the legality of your actions would be thrown out with all the dead ones.
I feel this sets a bad precident.
The only ones we tossed were any that didn’t make sense at all like the i win one and there was a viagra themed one. If need be take my admin powers. Only did what I thought was for the good of the nomic.
Same. If you think we’ve overstepped our bounds by deleting what is obviously spam, then I can accept that.
Rodlen:
“The post shall go on to describe the issue”
aka “the post is required to go on to describe the issue”
i don’t think “i win” (as the entirety of a post), for example, counts as describing an issue the poster felt needed urgently to be addressed
though i’d watch out for that amistar guy. (whoever he is)
i hear he sux.
We made sure to leave to CfJ that truely needed to get votes. Most of the spam ones were gonna die anyway
In retrospect I should have done what I did with these ones, marked them as illegal and closed them.
Cayvie:
“If two or more Characters actively disagree as to the interpretation of the Ruleset, or if a Character feels that an aspect of the game needs urgent attention, then any Character may raise a Call for Judgment (abbreviated CfJ) by posting an entry in the “Call for Judgment†category. If the Character wishes, he may post anonymously by choosing “Call for Judgment” from the Author drop-down menu on the OPTIONS tab. The post shall go on to describe the issue, and measures that shall be taken to resolve it.”
cfj != proposal.
there are strict circumstances in which cfjs are allowed. i think declaring many of the ones posted today illegal is totally cool.