Friday, July 11, 2008

Proposal: Its the Chaotic Neutral way

S.K.
-Amnistar

Adminned at 11 Jul 2008 20:45:11 UTC

Add a new subrule to the rule entitled “Money”.  Call it “Random encounters” and give it the following text:

The realm of Blognomic is littered with minor gold-carrying Monsters.  Each proposal, in addition to being an attempt to change the rules, also represents an encounter with such monsters.

Should a proposal by an Adventurer pass, enough other Adventurers have joined that the random monsters have been defeated, and its author gains 2DICEX Gold, where X is quorum.  Should a proposal by an Adventurer fail, the other Adventurers leave its author to get mugged and he loses 2DICEX gold, where X is the number of AGAINST votes on that proposal.  It’s almost as if those dire rats had some help…

posted by Bucky at 11 Jul 2008 02:15:01 UTC Comments (17)

Comments

Clucky: he/him

11-07-2008 02:29:50 UTC

for

Amnistar: he/him

11-07-2008 02:32:29 UTC

imperial

I’d like to see reward/penalty for helping make an adventurer suceed/fail as well.

Rodlen:

11-07-2008 02:32:58 UTC

imperial

Amnistar: he/him

11-07-2008 02:46:01 UTC

for In the hopes that my own proposal passes

Amnistar: he/him

11-07-2008 02:49:50 UTC

We also need to patch this to saythe number of COUNTER against votes, else it could be quite dangerous.

Yoda:

11-07-2008 03:40:51 UTC

for What do you mean by counter against votes?

I can see a s/ked proposal get lots of against votes after the s/k and the proposer losing a lot of money from it.

Amnistar: he/him

11-07-2008 05:14:18 UTC

Counter=Counted, sorry.

Darknight: he/him

11-07-2008 07:33:08 UTC

for

Seeking:

11-07-2008 11:00:14 UTC

for

Yoda:

11-07-2008 14:15:44 UTC

Oooh, that could potentially be quite dangerous.  We should probably fix that before we let that through to avoid any unnecessary problems. against COV

Amnistar: he/him

11-07-2008 15:05:58 UTC

against

We need a repropsed fix.

Rodlen:

11-07-2008 15:50:40 UTC

against Very dangerous. COV

Oh, and against  against  against  against  against  against .

Clucky: he/him

11-07-2008 16:34:07 UTC

I don’t think we need to fail the proposal just because a certain interpretation the rules. Let it pass, and then post a plug. If someone abuses it before the plug passes, have another plug fix the problem.

But Amnistar shouldn’t get out of his 2Xlots loss from his proposal. =P

Amnistar: he/him

11-07-2008 16:47:18 UTC

you know I’m not YOUR rival right Clucky?

Clucky: he/him

11-07-2008 17:40:37 UTC

You are in spirit. But it doesn’t make sense yet in game.

Bucky:

11-07-2008 23:21:15 UTC

against
S-K in favor of a repropose with clearer wording

arthexis: he/him

12-07-2008 02:14:57 UTC

against