Self-killed. Failed by Kevan.
Adminned at 17 Feb 2010 04:53:45 UTC
In Rule 2.4 (Cat and Mouse), remove the paragraph beginning “If there are ever fewer than two Murderers or fewer than two Detectives”.
This removes the rule saying that when murderers or detectives are killed, arrested or idle out, a random other player gets to take on their role.
Generally I would be for this, but if someone idles I think it’s best if a new guest gets his role. 
The thinking behind this was that there’s currently not much incentive to track down and arrest a murderer, as it just means that he or she will get a new, untraceable replacement.
Thing of it is the incentive to get rid of the murders is that maybe, just maybe, I might become the murder and get to do some killing.
@Kevan: You could make it so that there’s only a 75% chance (or something) that a murderer is replaceable.
I agree with Darth on this. No vote on the proposal, as Imperial would automatically mean For.
I’m more in favor of Anonyman’s proposal (http://blognomic.com/archive/the_death_of_death_itself/)
Self-kill, given that the awake players seem to be pro-uncertainty.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
per Kevan
Klisz: