Wednesday, April 02, 2025

Proposal: Lacunaic Bounties

Move the dynastic rule “Bounties” to become a subrule of “Lacunaic Actions”.

As it is, it’s unclear whether or not Josh will be able to pay out his Bounty, because Lacuna started too early to make it possible and it’s unclear whether the Bounty Payout action is fully dynastic or not. This change makes it Lacunaic, making it unambiguously possible to perform it.

Comments

JonathanDark: he/him

02-04-2025 19:23:34 UTC

I think Josh already closed and paid out the only Bounty that was posted. If you feel that should have been illegal, this would need to uphold that payout that already occurred.

JonathanDark: he/him

02-04-2025 19:24:20 UTC

ais523:

02-04-2025 19:36:55 UTC

Ah – I missed that it had been paid out already.

I don’t know whether that was illegal or not, and was hoping to not have to work it out. I’m leaning towards thinking that it was probably legal, on the basis that “Bounty Payout” is not defined only in the dynastic rules (as a building block rule specifies a default Bounty Payout action), but am not sure that that’s correct.

JonathanDark: he/him

02-04-2025 21:11:44 UTC

I’ll defer to Josh to decide whether or not this is worth having, since he’d be the one posting Bounties anyway. It feels like a moot point now.

imperial

DoomedIdeas: he/him

03-04-2025 05:05:21 UTC

imperial I doubt that there will be further bounties, but in case there are, I’ll also defer my vote to Josh.

Kevan: he/him

03-04-2025 06:19:42 UTC

imperial

Josh: Imperator he/they

03-04-2025 06:26:09 UTC

against Trash

Raven1207: he/they

03-04-2025 12:18:13 UTC

against

You must be logged in as a player to post comments.