Friday, February 01, 2013

Proposal: Last Man Standing

Timed out and passed, 9-0. nqeron gains 4 Credibility; Clucky, Murphy, Purplebeard, robo1995 and scshunt all lose 2 Credibility. Josh

Adminned at 03 Feb 2013 13:35:11 UTC

Create a new sub-rule of Credibility, “Corruption”.  Move the last two lines of Credibility (as it is now) into “Corruption”.

Add another line in Corruption to read:

If at any point, all but one Honourable Members are Corrupt,then that one Honourable member who is not corrupt achieves victory.  This applies even if that Honourable Member later becomes Corrupt or another Honourable Member who was Corrupt reverts to not being Corrupt.

I know that it might be a bit soon, but this was an interesting idea I had.  It also seemed eventual.  Plus, I like that it’s not really a ‘winner’, but rather a ‘not loser’.  Even with Josh’s changes, this should still take a bit of time to achieve.
It also kind of makes sense.

(Also, the first bit is just to move stuff around)

Comments

Josh:

02-01-2013 17:18:58 UTC

for

RaichuKFM:

02-01-2013 17:56:24 UTC

for I guess. This probably won’t be the way victory is achieved though.

Cpt_Koen:

02-01-2013 18:48:23 UTC

for

Larrytheturtle:

02-01-2013 19:41:57 UTC

for

Spitemaster:

02-01-2013 19:57:56 UTC

for

Patrick:

02-01-2013 20:01:55 UTC

for

Klisz:

02-01-2013 20:10:04 UTC

for

Skju:

02-02-2013 00:42:44 UTC

for