Proposal: Legalizing what we do anyway
At 2-8, cannot pass without a changed vote, and fails. —Brendan
Adminned at 07 Oct 2010 12:30:16 UTC
To rule 1.5 append
If one part of an enacted proposal relies on the gamestate existing in a certain state to have effect, and the gamestate does not exist as required by that part of the proposal, then that part of the proposal has no effect, but the rest of the proposal takes effects as it normally would.
A couple times per dynasty, we have a situation where a proposal references a non-existent rule because of a typo or something (eg. “Repeal rule ‘This is a rule’” instead of “‘This is a rules’”). Unless it’s a conditional, it technically invalidates the proposal, but we tend to ignore that anyway.
Darknight: he/him