Proposal: Let’s Get Down To Regional Business (To Defeat The Hun Region)
Times out 3-0 and is enacted -SingularByte
Adminned at 14 May 2023 08:30:59 UTC
If it was not enacted, enact Proposal: Local Government Dynasty. Then make the following changes to the rule Regional Development Fora:
* Change the second paragraph to read as follows:
If the number of days that have elapsed since the the resolution of the most recent Regional Development Forum for that Region is equal to or greater than its Development Cycle, and if there are no currently open Regional Development Fora for that Region, then any City Architect who controls a City in that Region may call a Regional Development Forum for that Region. If no Regional Development Forum has ever been called for that Region then any City Architect who controls a City in that Region may call a Regional Development Forum for that Region.
* Remove the words “in a named City” from the Develop motion.
* Change the bullet point that starts “One or more Motions” to read as follows:
* One or more Motions, but not more Motions than the current Development Cycle of the Region, of the author’s choosing; and, in addition, any Motions that were the subject of an Uptake motion in that Region’s previous Regional Development Forum.
SingularByte’s points from the last proposal. There are still two outstanding issues: how the spend of Unemployed Citizens can be consistently handled, and how Unincorporated Territories claw their way back into a Region.
JonathanDark: he/him
Unfortunately, because “Local Government Dynasty” was not enacted, the clause in “Taking Care of Regional Business” removing the phrase “The Region’s current Municipal Authority level;” won’t have any effect if it is enacted.
This could still prevent the creation of a Regional Development Forum since there’s no way to comply with the creation requirements.