Other way around? The Fine treasure chest gives the greater reduction under the Antioch proposal (-2 and -5 respectively).

Yeah, I thought about it, but per ais’ comments on the last proposal - an average chest gives less advantage to the player playing it, while a fine chest is something that you might elect to put out tactically, in a position close to a rival’s sepulchre.

I dunno, what do you think? It feels like average chests should be more common, as well, which lends weight to their being slightly cheaper.

True, the usefulness of these things does flip depending on whether they’re near your stuff or near an opponent’s, which makes it harder to cost. Maybe this is right.

Really this should’ve had a “If Proposal: Of Antioch was not enacted, enact it” rather than “does nothing” so we could safely vote down Of Antioch cause like I said in my comment there its pretty dangerous to leave that up for potentially a few hours, but

still

should we also change up the darkness on the perception & agility features?

i wonder if we ought to make it so that, like, u can only put a single feature of negative darkness in any given chamber, for balancing

@Lemon - might be an idea but given the lack of anybody building rooms rn I think we also might want to lower the base building cost a notch

Or maybe make it responsive to the total number of explored rooms? idk

@Josh i think nobody’s building rooms primarily bc we don’t have good reason to yet; that’s why im gonna propose dark machinations 2.0 asap so we can get some Motivation in here

There’s also the thing that building rooms puts you closer to getting ground into Dust, should any future mechanics arrive that lower Puissance further. As ever in Nomic, it’s risky to become an outlier.

Yeah that’s why I think it might be worth it being a little cheaper to get things started