Not bad, assuming you realize that under this wording, “location-specific commands” and “maximum capacity” don’t have to be abided by as you intended.

But I mean, I left the Grue Role deliberately vague, so maybe that was your idea too.

A couple of suggestions on rigorizing this:

- Location-specific commands, once enforced, might dictate the exact Result they yield.
- Directions should be absolute (north, south, etc) rather than relative (left, right, etc).
- Similarly, you might phrase the Description as the Result of the Examine command.

I agree with 75th.

This proposal defines a ‘Location’ as “must” having a maximum capacity, but then mentions other places as if they were ‘Locations’ (such as ‘The Ominous Forrest’) without either A) defining them in a subsection or B) mentioning their maximum capacity. It’s also vague whether ‘transports’ indicates changing the Location of a Protagonist or not.

(For that matter, and I’m not sure how specific people on this Nomic tend to get on things, there’s nothing that defines what a maximum capacity even is, or how it relates to the number of people in the room. Is it sufficient to just imply that?)

Nope, those are all valid complaints.

and the thing is people vary on their inturpretations of things.  I’ve ruined dynasties with my conception of vaugitude, such ruining was then CFJed for fixage and the world moved on, but it all depends on what people see and when they see it.

  vague as the ague

for now, since this Dynasty seems to be already taking on a refreshingly rigorous air.

Good Idea, bad implementation

I’m going to get around to explicitely giving this an .

Bandwagon, again.

peer pressure