Looks valid from here.

Congrats!

I would like a chance to double-check JD’s or ais523’s route before voting for this, as I thought it would have caught any attempt by ais523 to linger at G or C for four Minutes. (My suspicion is that a rule is malfunctioning in a way ais523 spotted and alerted Kevan to but nobody else did, but I’d like to know what it is.)

JD has messaged me to confirm his route, and there is indeed a window left open in it. No scam here, just bad luck.

Congratulations!

To confirm, my route was C, Grounds×6, C, C, C, Grounds×2.

I knew that there was a Guard at F at minute 9, and even if Quick, that Guard wouldn’t have time to get to C at minute 8, 9, or 10 (and there isn’t time to get to C from a Station at minute 1). So in order to block my route from working, you would need two Guards covering the A-G area of the hotel. I decided to bet my chances for the round on the Guards not doing that.

Nice job!

(A small gamestate error pointed out on Discord: DoomedIdeas should have 0 Infamy rather than 1, as they were Encountered.)

I think you can fix that even during Hiatus (the rule allowing you to fix it is in the Appendix, and Hiatuses only block actions “defined only in the Dynastic rules”).

Good point, may as well.

as the break-in was not legally run due to the choice for which burglar to sideline not being publicly randomly selected

Pretty sure “Lobby Boy” covers that.

@Clucky: “Whenever the Concierge is required to make a choice between several outcomes during the course of a dynastic action, they should do so in a secretly random manner.”

I think that applies to Sidelining too: it says “randomly” which is still a choice, and doesn’t contradict the rule requiring it to be secretly random.

Good thing they aren’t making a choice

Turns out Darknight admitted to bidding 5, so was the likely sidelined Burglar.

I bid 10, unsurprisingly. So even if the action were redone, it wouldn’t change the results.

as it appears it wouldn’t change anything