Friday, November 24, 2023

Proposal: Losing Strategy

Vetoed for the new dynasty. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 27 Nov 2023 18:27:46 UTC

Add the following to “Wizards”

Each Wizard has a number of Low Marks, which by default is zero

In “Commencing a duel” after the step “Reduce the Freshness of every Wizard by 1” add the step

If a single wizard has fewer stars than every other wizard, increase that Wizard’s Low Marks by 1

Add a new Achievement called “Drop-Out” with Criteria “Have at least three Low Marks at the end of the current duel’s televised period”
Add a new Achievement called “Masochist” with Criteria “Have a net loss of at least eight stars, not including any stars lost from the cost of casting a spell, during the current duel’s televised period”

 

Comments

4st:

25-11-2023 06:13:28 UTC

for I think this is more equitable

lendunistus: he/him

25-11-2023 06:17:34 UTC

against eh, I don’t really like masochist, feels like it’s going to make targeting people in the lead much more dangerous

JonathanDark: he/him

25-11-2023 06:29:36 UTC

Well, “lead” is not quite the right term. You can lead in Stars and still not win if others can get to 3 achievements first, so targeting one person with damaging spells isn’t really a long-term effective strategy. At best, it might slow down someone from getting the High Marks necessary to to get Honor Student.

JonathanDark: he/him

25-11-2023 06:42:43 UTC

Also think of it as insurance against the Star leader using damaging spells to keep 2nd and 3rd place Star leaders from taking the lead. They’ll have to think carefully about that.

Kevan: he/him

25-11-2023 15:48:16 UTC

Masochist seems tacked on here, given that the proposal was prompted (on Discord) by Zack mourning the enactment of Whiteout and saying that they were trying for a low Star count.

It’s hard not to read Masochist as confirmation that we correctly closed a “quickly lose any number of Stars” loophole with Whiteout, and that this proposal would add it back.

against

Zack: he/him

25-11-2023 19:26:22 UTC

I really don’t think there was ever such a loophole, that just sounds like confirmation bias. These are functionally the same as Honor Student/Superstar, and no one seems worried about those. for

lendunistus: he/him

25-11-2023 19:57:38 UTC

I genuinely feel like masochist is just too easy to achieve

Superstar is fine in isolation since there’s a clear way to deny someone from getting it, but once Masochist comes into play, it’s a tightrope walk that I just don’t think is fun for most people involved

JonathanDark: he/him

26-11-2023 02:25:57 UTC

Wild. It’s that very tightrope that I think would make things more interesting. I’m curious who else would find it less fun.

Clucky: he/him

26-11-2023 22:00:44 UTC

imperial

Vovix: he/him

26-11-2023 22:28:24 UTC

for

Vovix: he/him

27-11-2023 18:26:00 UTC

CoV veto There are no Wizards in this court. Not yet, at least?