Tuesday, January 02, 2024

Proposal: Lower Case [Core] [Appendix]

Reached Quorum, 5-0. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 04 Jan 2024 00:54:18 UTC

In the rule “Dynasties”, replace “Unless otherwise stated by a dynastic rule, for the purposes of dynastic and Building Blocks rules, the Grim Reaper is not a Necromancer.”, with:-

Unless otherwise stated by a dynastic or Building Blocks rule, then for the purposes of dynastic and Building Blocks rules, the Grim Reaper is not a Necromancer.

Throughout the ruleset and the Building Blocks wiki page, replace the term “Special Case” with “Building Blocks”.

Allowing the proposed “Everyone’s Playing” Building Block to function, and cleaning up some leftover mentions of Special Case in the Core and Appendix sections (and also the Building Blocks page itself).

Comments

lendunistus: he/him

02-01-2024 13:02:42 UTC

why exclude the emperor from appendix rules? all it does is just break a bunch of things

“that Votable Matter must name a Necromancer with such access”, “the Necromancer making this determination may do so using a private method of their choosing”, arguably “Any Necromancer may post to the blog at any time”

lendunistus: he/him

02-01-2024 13:05:39 UTC

as written, “replace the word “dynastic”” would arguably replace both instances of said word

apologies, doubt that was intentional

Kevan: City he/him

02-01-2024 13:12:46 UTC

Good catch! It’s the second problem that was unintentional and that causes the first problem - the intention is just to allow a Building Blocks rule to overrule Dynasties. I’ve reworded the amendment.

Clucky: he/him

02-01-2024 17:02:14 UTC

for good catch

JonathanDark: he/him

02-01-2024 17:34:01 UTC

for

Desertfrog:

02-01-2024 17:52:19 UTC

for

Raven1207: he/they

02-01-2024 22:53:49 UTC

for