Saturday, February 21, 2009

Proposal: Loyalty Test, Part II

A quorum of soldiers has refused to take this test, therefor the test shall not be conducted, thankfully.

Slightly disgruntled Private Darknight

Adminned at 22 Feb 2009 13:59:35 UTC

Increase the ammo of each Soldier who voted FOR on this proposal by 30.
Lower the Health of each Soldier who voted AGAINST this proposal by 5.

Now, you wouldn’t want the enacting Admin to lose some of their Loyalty for your reckless voting. Be responsible Soldiers: Vote FOR and help increase our ammo production for the upcoming skirmishes.

posted by arthexis at 21 Feb 2009 06:38:00 UTC Comments (24)

Comments

Rodlen: Idle

21-02-2009 07:15:53 UTC

imperial I don’t trust you…

Wakukee: Idle

21-02-2009 07:28:00 UTC

Quick!  veto It!  imperial

ais523: Custodian

21-02-2009 09:54:28 UTC

imperial, and I suggest everyone vote DEFERENTIAL on this one so Amni can kill it in one go without having to spend a veto.

dogfish: Idle

21-02-2009 10:27:48 UTC

If we all vote against then nothing happens anyway. Nobody loses health if it fails!  imperial

Devenger: Idle

21-02-2009 11:04:03 UTC

imperial Come on Arth, stop tryin’ ta break the game just because you aren’t as Loyal as some of us.

Gnauga: Idle

21-02-2009 14:38:25 UTC

for because none of you guys are getting the ammo.

Kevan: he/himIdle

21-02-2009 15:40:38 UTC

imperial

Igthorn: Idle

21-02-2009 15:47:53 UTC

imperial

SingularByte: he/himIdle

21-02-2009 16:17:13 UTC

imperial

Wakukee: Idle

21-02-2009 20:54:54 UTC

Hmm… Amni can still veto for free.  for

Wakukee: Idle

21-02-2009 20:55:17 UTC

And there are no against votes.

Rodlen: Idle

22-02-2009 00:36:15 UTC

“A vote of DEFERENTIAL is a vote of no opinion, or of faith in the decision of the General. The vote will count as the same as the General’s vote.”

Deferential votes, if Amni votes for, get ammo.

Darknight: he/him

22-02-2009 00:42:10 UTC

for

arthexis: he/himIdle

22-02-2009 00:51:40 UTC

If Amni votes against, you’re all screwed.

Wakukee: Idle

22-02-2009 01:06:52 UTC

No, because it won’t pass.

Rodlen: Idle

22-02-2009 01:24:58 UTC

And, as established in Purplebeard’s Evil Dynasty, effects mentioned in a proposal, even if they only are supposed to happen if they are vetoed, don’t happen if the proposal fails or is vetoed.

Klisz: Idle

22-02-2009 01:27:45 UTC

for

Qwazukee: Idle

22-02-2009 02:54:22 UTC

imperial

Clucky: he/himIdle

22-02-2009 07:15:42 UTC

against

Penalizing people for against votes is what we like to call a dick move.

arthexis: he/himIdle

22-02-2009 10:29:09 UTC

Sorry Clucky, I am just trying to abuse Loyalty for all I can.

Amnistar: he/himIdle

22-02-2009 15:26:21 UTC

against

Klisz: Idle

22-02-2009 16:21:52 UTC

CoV against

Kevan: he/himIdle

22-02-2009 18:02:51 UTC

CoV also: against

Darknight: he/him

22-02-2009 21:53:37 UTC

against COV